Comments on Proposal

Return-path: 
X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 0;andrew.cmu.edu;Network-Mail
Received: from po2.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail
          ID ;
          Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:46:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gauss.ece.cmu.edu (ADMINWWW.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.251.4]) by po2.and
rew.cmu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id OAA10002 for ; 
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:46:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ece.cmu.edu (CHENPC1.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.102.35]) by gauss.ece.cmu
.edu (8.6.11/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA20490; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:46:28 -0500
Message-ID: <34F32399.ECDDB9D7@ece.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:46:33 -0500
From: Tsuhan Chen 
Reply-To: tsuhan@ece.cmu.edu
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kunwadee@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Comments for your project description
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for sending me your project description. As we discussed, I like it very much. I think you will have some very interesting results. Some further comments:

1. Since compression is not your major emphasis, it is ok to use off-the-shelf codec. Note that you can compress video into bitstreams off-line. For your experiments, you will then packets the bitstream and send the packets out, in which the exact scheme/parameters will be adaptive to the network traffic.

2. As I mentioned, I hope you will also study also the error resilience issues at the decoder.

For the mid-term, I suggest you show a working MPEG2 video coding with offline encoding, real-time transmission over the network, and perhaps real-time decoding. Good luck!

Back to Project Homepage