Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
projects [2015/12/06 19:38]
nandita [Final Presentation (December 14th)]
projects [2015/12/13 19:01] (current)
nandita [Important Dates]
Line 17: Line 17:
   * **Milestone 1**: October 20 and 21, 2015   * **Milestone 1**: October 20 and 21, 2015
   * **Milestone 2**: November 17, 2015   * **Milestone 2**: November 17, 2015
-  * **Final Presentation**:​ December 14, 2015 (1:30 - 4:30 PM)+  * **Final Presentation**:​ December 14, 2015 (2:00 - 4:30 PM)
   * **Poster Session**: December 15, 2015 (1:30 - 4:30 PM)   * **Poster Session**: December 15, 2015 (1:30 - 4:30 PM)
   * **Project Report Due**: December 20, 2015 (midnight)   * **Project Report Due**: December 20, 2015 (midnight)
Line 86: Line 86:
  
 ===== Final Presentation (December 14th)  ===== ===== Final Presentation (December 14th)  =====
-**When:​** ​ December 14th, 2015 (1:30 - 4:30 PM)+**When:​** ​ December 14th, 2015 (2:00 - 4:30 PM) 
 **Where:** CIC 4th Floor, Panther Hollow Conference Room **Where:** CIC 4th Floor, Panther Hollow Conference Room
-**Format:** 15 mins in total: ​ presenting slides (12 mins)  + Q&A (3 mins).  ​+ 
 +**Format:** 15 mins in total: ​ presenting slides (12 mins)  + Q&A (3 mins).  ​**Please practice for this length.** You will be given a warning at 10 minutes and cut off at 12. 
 + 
 +**Submission:​** You must send your slides in pptx format to 740-official@ece.cmu.edu by 11 AM on December 14th. We will be running all presentations on a staff computer to reduce delay between presenters. 
 + 
 +**What to present:​** 
 +  * The problem you are solving + your goal 
 +  * How is this different from past work? What is your novelty? 
 +  * The key idea behind your solution 
 +  * More details on your mechanims 
 +  * Your methodology to test your ideas 
 +  * Results and analyses from your evaluation and comparison with prior work 
 +  * Conclusion with advantages and shortcomings of your mechanism and future work 
 + 
 +** Presentation Schedule (14th December)** 
 +  -  Dimitrios Stamoulis and Antonis Manousis 
 +  -  Jonathan Leung and Madhav Iyengar 
 +  -  Vignesh Balaji 
 +  -  Elliot Rosen and Gaurav Srivastava 
 +  -  Elena Feldman, Ashish Shrestha and Amanda Marano 
 +  - Amirali Boroumand and Minesh Patel 
 +  - Abhijith Kashyap 
 + 
 +** Presentation Schedule (16th December)** 
 +  - Damla Senol and Jeremie Kim 
 +  - Kais Kudrolli and Raghav Gupta
  
  
Line 106: Line 132:
  
 [[http://​www.ece.cmu.edu/​~ece740/​f11/​doku.php?​id=wiki:​project#​poster_session|more example posters]] [[http://​www.ece.cmu.edu/​~ece740/​f11/​doku.php?​id=wiki:​project#​poster_session|more example posters]]
 +
 +===== Final Project Report (December 20th) =====
 +
 +You will hand in a report in the conference submission style.
 +Your final report should be formatted and written as if you are submitting the report to a top computer architecture conference.
 +The report should include the following:
 +
 +  * A descriptive title and author names
 +  * Abstract
 +  * Introduction (Problem and Motivation)
 +  * Related Work and its Shortcomings
 +  * Description of the Techniques (designed and evaluated)
 +  * Evaluation Methodology
 +  * Results and Analyses
 +  * Conclusion/​Summary
 +  * Lessons Learned, Shortcomings,​ and Future Work
 +  * Acknowledgements (if any)
 +  * References (cited throughout the paper)
 +
 +The page limit is 10 double column, single-spaced pages. Make sure your document is spell-checked and grammatically sound. You are encouraged to use the LaTeX template above.
 +
 +Advice:
 +The key characteristic that distinguishes a “good” research paper from a “bad” one is the existence of “clearly explained insight.” I expect the highest quality of writing as well as clear descriptions of the ideas and techniques from the final report. Even if your research results in a “negative result” (not all research ideas pan out to be useful, in fact few of them do) writing it in a very insightful and intuitive manner can make the research very powerful and important. So, please do spend a significant amount of time and effort to ensure that your report is insightful and explains the ideas very clearly (possibly with examples and good analogies).
 +
 +**Examples:​**
 +
 +See the readings throughout this course for examples. Some selected favorites:
 +
 +{{:​parbs_isca08.pdf|Mutlu and Moscibroda, “Parallelism-Aware Batch Scheduling,​” ISCA 2008.}}
 +
 +{{mutlu_micro05.pdf|Onur Mutlu, Hyesoon Kim, and Yale N. Patt, "​Address-Value Delta (AVD) Prediction: Increasing the Effectiveness of Runahead Execution by Exploiting Regular Memory Allocation Patterns,"​ MICRO 2005.}}
 +